<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links for 2009-03-25</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jessicachapel.com/2009/03/25/links-for-2009-03-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jessicachapel.com/2009/03/25/links-for-2009-03-25/</link>
	<description>Thoroughbred racing news and notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 23:54:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJXD2</title>
		<link>http://jessicachapel.com/2009/03/25/links-for-2009-03-25/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>EJXD2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jessicachapel.com/2009/03/25/links-for-2009-03-25/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hey, our pick last year, Gayego, looks like a serious horse. He&#039;s in the Godolphin Mile tomorrow.

I&#039;m a big believer in the juvenile form as an indicator of being a top-class animal early in a 3YO season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, our pick last year, Gayego, looks like a serious horse. He&#8217;s in the Godolphin Mile tomorrow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big believer in the juvenile form as an indicator of being a top-class animal early in a 3YO season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://jessicachapel.com/2009/03/25/links-for-2009-03-25/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jessicachapel.com/2009/03/25/links-for-2009-03-25/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Yes, and this year, I&#039;m reeling in my obsession with historical criteria after going a little overboard the past two Derbies, keeping it to basics such as juvenile form and two-turn prep, and what each starter has actually done this spring. (We&#039;ll see how this works out for me -- I have a lousy Derby wagering record.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and this year, I&#8217;m reeling in my obsession with historical criteria after going a little overboard the past two Derbies, keeping it to basics such as juvenile form and two-turn prep, and what each starter has actually done this spring. (We&#8217;ll see how this works out for me &#8212; I have a lousy Derby wagering record.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJXD2</title>
		<link>http://jessicachapel.com/2009/03/25/links-for-2009-03-25/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>EJXD2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jessicachapel.com/2009/03/25/links-for-2009-03-25/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s gotten to the point where there are too many variables being considered. You can probably take any winner of the Derby and find something s/he did that no other winner had done in awhile.

The seven-week layoff for FF and the no running at 2 for Dunkirk will be the big ones this year, though, and I&#039;m inclined to toss both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s gotten to the point where there are too many variables being considered. You can probably take any winner of the Derby and find something s/he did that no other winner had done in awhile.</p>
<p>The seven-week layoff for FF and the no running at 2 for Dunkirk will be the big ones this year, though, and I&#8217;m inclined to toss both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

