Comments on: Déjà Vu Eclipse

By: Jessica

Jessica — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:31:08 +0000

Fiona, you bring up an excellent point. The captions or context provided for these photos always point out that horse and rider came up uninjured (thankfully!), but a picture of fall is still unsettling, and seeing such a photo honored even more so. It trades on the danger on racing and at the same diminishes that danger. It is chilling.

Best wishes to your nephew and family. It was heartening to read that some movement has returned to his toes.

By: sid fernando

sid fernando — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:27:28 +0000

i know mick — that’s mike marten — and he is a superior photographer. that a flying jock or falling horse would be the recent trend for an award is so simplistic that the sensationalistic attributes to it are passe. the people that judge these awards should be photographers with a racing background, so please don’t tell me these judges were.

By: Fiona Farrell

Fiona Farrell — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:06:13 +0000

I found the photo interesting to see clip along the horse’s rump. But it leaves me chilled and nauseous. Not for any documentary or aesthetic reasons but because my nephew Michael Straight may well be paralyzed for life due to a fall from a horse during a race. Eclipses for photos like this are merely part of the “blood and circuses” approach to racing coverage and recognition that leave me cold. Plain old “bread and circuses” is enough for this writer. I write this not in critique of the photographer but of the judges’ selection.

By: Jessica

Jessica — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:53:43 +0000

Thanks, Anon @ 9:28, for the link to Marten’s photo. You’re right, by any measure — editorial, technical, artistic — it’s a superior shot.

Equidaily addresses your point, Anon @ 11:55, on its front page this morning. It is an embarrassment, the repeated duplication. (No offense meant to the winning photographers.)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:55:55 +0000

Agree Marten’s shot is far better and thanks for linking to it. My point was simply that this is not the first time the judges have gone for very similar images.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:48:38 +0000

This year’s winning photo is a terrible disappointment. So many great moments in racing this year and NTRA continues to choose tragic moments of individuals getting injured and duplicating the scenes.

The same photo won in 2007. Hello????

There is nothing special about that photo AT ALL.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:28:57 +0000

The difference between Marten’s flying dismount and Goins’ is that Marten’s is infinitely better. His is at a better point in the leap and has “Muttonchops” in the background mimicking Dettori’s right along with him.

http://www.horsephotos.com/watermark.jsp?photoID=50370

Nothing against Matt, but it’s just not nearly as good.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:48:06 +0000

Can't find the photo itself online, but the winning shot in 1999 by Michael Marten looked a lot like Matt Goins' 2008 winner - a flying dismount by jockey Frankie Dettori. A bit more info here, but wish I could find the photo: http://www.ntra.com/content.aspx?type=news&id=5348

By: Jessica

Jessica — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:49:16 +0000

Going on evidence from the past few years, your friend has a point.

What I don’t understand about the photography award is how it’s been so off the mark for several years. Going back to 2004, the trend has been for gimmicky or sensationalistic photos. Is the problem in the submission process? The judging?

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:19:16 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by railbird: Deja Vu Eclipse http://goo.gl/fb/ZLUe...