JC / Railbird

I Heart Synthetics

Thanks for all the great comments on this post linking to Andrew Beyer’s column about the Blue Grass. I’m reminded of why I enjoy this game so much: It’s a perpetual puzzle that attracts smart people and spirited discussion, and it’s one of the few hobbies or pursuits that doesn’t just reward contrarianism, but practically demands it.
I like synthetic surfaces: I went to Turfway in 2006 to see Polytrack up close, I started following the Southern California circuit with the advent of Cushion Track at Hollywood, I prefer playing Keeneland Polytrack to Keeneland dirt. Putting aside the safety question, I enjoy handicapping these surfaces. I like that stamina is rewarded and cheap speed folds, that new pedigree plays are popping up. Synthetics shake up the scene, create new challenges and betting opportunities, and if they’re properly installed and maintained, they play fair. Like commenter ‘Crunk, I’ve found there are differences between the surfaces — just as there between dirt tracks — and I’ve adjusted my handicapping.
I won’t argue that some surfaces aren’t quirkier than others — that the pick six at Keeneland went unhit for seven days and that favorites through Sunday had won only 18% of races (although, favorites did finish in the money 63% of the time, so it’s not total chaos in Kentucky), suggests horses and handicappers are struggling with the surface there — but neither am I willing to throw up my hands and declare synthetic track results bizarre and incomprehensible, at least not any more so than I would other surfaces, such as Aqueduct’s inner dirt mid-winter.
As for the Blue Grass and what it means for the Derby: Monba is a solid and versatile, if uninspiring, colt. Throw out the Fountain of Youth, credit his myectomy for the Blue Grass turnaround, and you’re left with a middling horse who could win the Derby if this year’s field were filled with similarly dull beasts. (Aside: When will horseplayers get disclosure of surgical procedures performed between races? It’s ridiculous that Monba flipped his palate and had throat surgery to prevent another displacement and that wasn’t officially reported anywhere.) Pyro didn’t take to the track and he didn’t show anything in the stretch. He seems to have come out of the race fine, so he’ll almost certainly bounce back to his pre-Keeneland performance level in the Derby, but it won’t be enough, no matter how well he works. That says more about the rigors of the Derby than it does about the surface of the Blue Grass.

Related: Ellis Starr says “Adapt or die!” when it comes to synthetic surfaces. That’s harsher than I’d put it, but it’s not the worst advice …


3 Comments

I only like synthetics if they truly are safer for the horses. Once that’s proven, IF, for sure, then I support a uniform switch.

Posted by Ernie Munick on April 17, 2008 @ 1:22 pm

2 things-
The pick6 at KEE does not attract the type of wagering that CA or NY does. Same goes for GP and CD. There’s not much bet into that pool on a regular basis. It’s not just because of poly either. For some reason at the mid-west tracks and GP – no one plays it. If there was a 7 day carryover at a NY or CA track, it’s possible that the pool would swell to 8 digits, easy, compared to the measly 6 figure pool generated for 7 days of carryover at KEE.
The other thing regarding favorites @ KEE. Like Saratoga, it’s a place to bring high class horses back off long layoffs. The 3rd race on Saturday was a prime example of this. Smoke’n Coal switched barns and trainers, off a long layoff and never been on poly sent out favorite over Meal Penalty, a horse with some recency and a poly win.
Forgetting that I always love to bet against the switch from X barn to Godolphin first time, there were other angle in play here that made Smoke ‘n Coal a bad favorite.
There a race like that everyday @ KEE.

Posted by o_crunk on April 17, 2008 @ 2:48 pm

o_crunk brings up a great angle: betting against first-time bin Suroor.

Posted by EJXD2 on April 17, 2008 @ 7:11 pm