JC / Railbird

We Get It, Now Shut Up

Forget history, forget science. Just cherry pick a few high-profile examples, make a few specious connections, ignore evidence to the contrary. We get it: In certain testosterone-addled minds, fillies and mares can’t compete against males without risking death or a barren womb:

“That’s just the way this planet is.”

Say that about Makybe Diva, Ouija Board, Gorella, Soviet Song, Intercontinental, Azeri, Serena’s Song, Sharp Cat, Dahlia, Personal Ensign, Lady’s Secret, Miesque, Imp, Regret, Busher, Gallorette, and Beldame.

And then shut up.

Of all the debates that have arisen following Eight Belles’ tragic post-Derby accident, the one over whether fillies should race colts is the most ridiculous, the most baseless, the most groundless. It’s a bizarre superimposition of human sexism over equine abilities, and it’s tiresome and distracting, especially when there are more significant issues to address — like drugs in racing, track surfaces, and breeding.

Really care about protecting horses? Then worry about the matters that actually affect their safety. Hint: None have anything to do with gender.


6 Comments

Jess – Well put. What would we do these days without you angry blogger chicks? :-)
By the way, who exactly suffers if the barren womb theory is true? Not the filly I’d guess. How would you like to be pregnant 11 months out of every single year? I know some women who’d rather be humanely destroyed!

Posted by alan on May 15, 2008 @ 11:24 am

I remember a great article in Tennis magazine years ago at the height of Martina Navratilova’s dominance on the women’s tour. Apparently, in an effort to bolster interest in Tennis, the USTA wanted to sponsor a series of events where the men squared off against the women. While none of the actual players went on the record, the coaches of some of the top men in the world hinted that the events were dead in the water because none of them wanted to face her in a singles match.

Posted by Adam (aka Swifty) on May 15, 2008 @ 1:50 pm

Thank you again.
A friend’s former racemare finally had her first foal after more than 12 months’ gestation (horrors!) – mom and baby were both fine and if all goes well, we’ll see a nice filly on the track in 2 years or so.
It’s pretty clear our friend at ESPN has no knowledge of international racing.

Posted by Superfecta on May 15, 2008 @ 2:04 pm

Agree, Nicely said.

Posted by Ernie Munick on May 15, 2008 @ 6:29 pm

Meanwhile …
Sandra McKee of the Baltimore Sun at the stakes barn Thursday morning talking to Rick Dutrow.
SM: So, what does Winstrol do?
RD: I don’t know.
— Blinkers Off

Posted by Blinkers Off on May 15, 2008 @ 11:15 pm

Thanks. Forde’s piece pushed me over the edge on this topic. Seriously — what was he thinking connecting running in the Derby with a paddock fall? Or using a football analogy? And yes, he definitely lacks any knowledge of the international scene. (Which someone wrote about recently — was it Valerie who tallied the runners in recent Australian races and found a good mix?)
Blinkers Off, delighted to see your report from Baltimore. That little exchange must have been followed by several minutes of unrestrained laughter …

Posted by Jessica on May 16, 2008 @ 11:59 am