JC / Railbird

Slots — Bad Bet?

Boston Globe columnist Brian McGrory paid a recent visit to Lincoln Park in Rhode Island and came away unimpressed:

The stale, hazy air smells like a Greyhound bus station, or maybe that’s the nearby greyhound kennels.
The merry dinging and donging of the electronic games strikes a sharp contrast to the nervous and sometimes desperate-looking people watching their Social Security checks vanish before their eyes.
A bartender asks a customer if he’d like his chardonnay on ice.
All the while, one question keeps popping to mind: Have we gone completely insane?
You see, if some increasingly vocal Massachusetts officials have their way, this exact kind of sleazy slots parlor is about to infect a neighborhood near you.

McGrory’s argument against slots at Massachusetts racetracks, such as Suffolk Downs, can be reduced to this: Slots parlors are depressing and tempt the poor. If we must have slots, he writes, “License a resort-style casino designed to compete with what’s in Connecticut,” and “Put it far from any urban center.” Yes, let’s — because when slots are played in a casino that’s frequented by surburban vacationers, gambling is wholesome entertainment. When slots are played trackside in the city — possibly by people so tacky they want ice in their chardonnay — it’s exploitation.

Boston mayor Thomas Menino announced his support for racetrack slots in May and has since come under criticism for taking campaign donations from Suffolk Downs officials and owners, and now from other gambling industry executives. The Boston Herald reports that the mayor received $1,000 each from Wonderland dog track owner Charles Sarkis and Harrah’s Entertainment executive Gary Loveman.

A slots deal between NYRA and New York horsemen is nearing conclusion. “We’re pretty close to a deal,” said Alan Foreman, the counsel for the New York Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association. “We haven’t finalized anything, but I think we can get everything ironed out in the next 24 hours or so.” (Daily Racing Form)