JC / Railbird

They Won, They’re In

– Did anyone else find Saturday’s first Breeders’ Cup Challenge day as much a yawn as I did? Three of the four horses who won at Saratoga were probably headed to the Breeders’ Cup anyway, although Lawyer Ron was being considered for the Mile, a race perhaps more suited to his running style, and now has a berth in the Classic, a race he finished ninth in last year. Go For Wand winner Ginger Punch will have to be supplemented $180,000 to claim her guaranteed Distaff spot. It was great to see My Typhoon score a well-earned G1 victory following two G2 wins and Diabolical is a fine sprinter, but neither could be considered a “Cinderella” horse capable of whipping up casual fan interest as BC president Greg Avioli talked about happening in an interview before the Diana. The thing is, without standings, a better distribution of graded stakes among the divisions, and incentives for trainers to seek competition rather than duck it, Lawyer Ron’s record-setting Whitney and the other three stakes on Saturday remain just as unconnected and one-off as they did when there was no Challenge. “Win and You’re In” is a good concept, but it needs work.
– Todd Pletcher’s Saratoga slump extends to more than two-year-olds: The supertrainer has won just four of 25 starts in the meet’s first week. Admittedly, two of those wins were the Sanford and Whitney, but Pletcher is disappointed with his record so far anyway (Times Union).
– He wasn’t fully cranked, he got trapped on the inside, but Kentucky Derby winner Street Sense prevailed in Sunday’s Jim Dandy Stakes just the same. “It was a good, solid prep to get him ready for the Travers,” said trainer Carl Nafzger after (Blood-Horse).
Rags to Riches is back in training (DRF).


9 Comments

If you didn’t notice, the BCC is not for you. And, if you don’t support it then dont be suprised if sooner than later horse racing is completly off national tv. Then you can yawn to yourself all day with TVG.

Posted by neg on July 31, 2007 @ 7:49 am

I was going to make a similar comment to neg, although not in an “attack” kind of way (why do folks take things so personal?)
Regardless, I though the same thing about it being ho-hum but then figured that this is really just to help the unwashed masses better understand racing by adding a playoff-esque element.

Posted by michael on July 31, 2007 @ 7:58 am

Thanks for the comments. I understand, that since I’m already a racing fan, the Challenge isn’t aimed at the likes of me. Isn’t that part of the problem? Shouldn’t a series of races billed as playoffs for the Breeders’ Cup offer something of interest to year-round fans as well as something exciting to casual fans and newcomers? Instead, we’re being given Potemkin rivalries and trompe l’oeil competition. “Win and You’re In” is a good idea; this year’s implementation a good starting point. But the Challenge needs more substance, some true competitiveness, for any of us — casual, newbie, devoted — to pay attention.

Posted by Jessica on July 31, 2007 @ 10:02 am

I didn’t even learn about the “Win and You’re In” angle until this weekend’s televised racing. And here I thought I was sorta up to date on this stuff!
I hope it does interest new fans, because it clearly stirs no interest amongst those who’ve been following for awhile. Maybe if the winner were a bit of a long shot it would seem more exciting.

Posted by Jolene on July 31, 2007 @ 10:10 am

If you are a racing fan, you should enjoy the fact that you get to see lots of grade 1 and 2’s all on nat tv and in a two hour window. I’m a racing fan and i don’t get TVG or HRTV and I appreciate the fact that someone has decided to put on top racing from top venues in such a manner. Being in the TV biz, I know that putting HR on TV is a losing proposition so this series is PURELY for the FANS both causal and core. Core gets many great races in a row from top venues. Causal gets the same and gets a hook that they may understand as opposed to graded earning points in graded races or intl panel of experts picking fields. Just a hook.

Posted by neg on July 31, 2007 @ 10:12 am

I pray that the W&I format will be tweaked to accomodate fans that are already there in the manner you mention: standings. However, for now, I’m just grinning and bearing it because I believe change is slowly happening, and you just gotta hang your hat on that and be happy.

Posted by Patrick on July 31, 2007 @ 10:18 am

Actually Neg, I don’t always like the National coverage as it’s sometimes too much fluff and not enough up-to-the-minute information. I know this will draw in the new viewers, but I can only take so many features on Dr. Richardson and New Bolton… also, nevermind that the “Budwieser Longshot” is never a live long-priced horse, rather it’s just a long-priced horse.
That being said, my wife and I went on a walk with our dogs and paused the Tivo… we came back to fast forward through the fluff of the first 3 races and watched the Whitney live.

Posted by Michael on July 31, 2007 @ 1:09 pm

Michael, be careful what you wish for. Peace.

Posted by Eh.. on July 31, 2007 @ 2:01 pm

I have to agree. I thought the races were mostly a snore. On the other hand, I’ll watch any kind of TB racing regardless of how rotten the coverage is, which races the networks choose to cover, or how lousy the commentary, because it’s racing and there is so little of it.

Posted by Jody on August 1, 2007 @ 4:05 pm