JC / Railbird

Sporting Greatness

Eight were inducted into the Racing Hall of Fame on Monday, including recently retired Funny Cide jockey Jose Santos, who got three standing ovations during the ceremony (DRF), and Boston-connected Triple Tiara winner Mom’s Command (Herald). With 11 victories in 16 starts, the champion filly’s place in the Hall of Fame is well deserved, but Bill Finley raises a good question about future equine honorees in his ESPN column:

Do the stars of the modern era, a period in racing’s history where the majority of top horses have had very limited campaigns — deserve to be enshrined alongside the true greats and warriors of the game?

It hardly matters. Hall of Fame rules stipulate one horse, one human inductee from each category every year. So, what will future voters do with Horse of the Year Invasor, one of the best racehorses in recent years, retired with an injury after only seven starts outside Uruguay? Or Rags to Riches, who will skip the Alabama to start in the Ruffian or Gazelle this September and then run in the Breeders’ Cup (DRF)? She’ll almost certainly enter the Hall of Fame on the basis of her historic Belmont win, even if her career ends after two more starts.


1 Comment

Invasor belongs in the Hall of Fame, of course. He is a Triple Crown winner in Uruguay, where the racing is pretty decent, from what I’ve seen of it (more than I care to admit) and a dominant runner in the United States, from his superb win in the Pimlico Special right up to defeating Bernardini. Rags to Riches, too, belongs in, based on the Belmont win. What about Smarty Jones and Point Given, though? Now, I’m beginning to give pause. I’d also like a full airing of just who are the hallowed keepers that get to vote for this award. It’s certainly not the same folks who bestow the Eclipse Awards. Should it be? — J.S.

Posted by J.S. on August 8, 2007 @ 1:20 am