JC / Railbird

Instant Reaction …

To the Breeders’ Cup announcement that the event will feature an all-female day of racing on Friday, that the Breeders’ Cup Distaff will be renamed the Ladies’ Classic, and that the Breeders’ Cup will be partnering with organizations to host “cause-related programs focused on women’s health” the same day:
– An all-female day of great racing is a great idea (as suggested by Superfecta months ago). [2/28 Addendum: Or maybe not so wonderful. Over on Left at the Gate, Alan worries the Friday move “threatens to make the Ladies second class citizens.”]
– Renaming the Distaff the Ladies’ Classic is a silly and very bad idea. The name change tosses tradition and manages to sound both trivializing and unpleasantly old-fashioned.
– Please, don’t put the pink ribbon on the saddle cloths. I’m all for women’s health, but women are more than their bodies. If the Breeders’ Cup is going to promote an all-female day of racing, let’s see positive expressions of women in the sport as horseplayers and horsewomen, not marketing tie-ins about women’s health issues.
More: Reactions abound across the blogosphere, some positive, some negative. “It smacks of sexism,” writes John on Not to the Swift. I second the sentiment.
Columnist Maryjean Wall also protests the changes: “Every time I think that maybe, just maybe, we might hope to get past genderizing our culture, I am reminded how we really only stand on the brink of tottering backward.”


10 Comments

I agree that the new name for the Distaff is awful. The only thing worse than pink ribbons on the saddlecloths is all-pink saddlecloths (I wish they’d go back to the standard colors)…
I don’t care for them moving the F&M Turf and Distaff off of Saturday, because it means that those damn Dirt Marathon and Dirt Mile races will factor into my multi-race bets now…

Posted by Michael on February 27, 2008 @ 1:46 pm

Pink saddlecloths. Whatever ‘pride’ I may have had in being female just went down a notch. Just watch, the ribbon will be in the horse’s forelock.
Why do I have a sinking feeling I won’t be buying any wearable merchandise this year?
I suppose I never understood the thinking that women needed to be recognized as such … I’d like to be treated no differently, and be seen as an individual, rather than my gender.

Posted by Nellie on February 27, 2008 @ 2:26 pm

Sorry, I think I’ve caused some confusion — there was no specific mention of pink ribbons anywhere in the BC press release about Friday, just the statements about promoting the day alongside women’s health groups. I alluded to the ribbon only because breast cancer groups are the most visible of “cause-related” women’s health organizations and seemed likely partners for the Breeders’ Cup …
Still, terrible name change, and I really hope the BC doesn’t go overboard with the whole women’s health thing. It always strikes me as tiresome marketing shorthand, using health issues to reach women as a group, and bizarrely negative too …

Posted by Jessica on February 27, 2008 @ 3:49 pm

I think you can count on pink ribbons somewhere on the saddlecloth. I’d bet on it.
Hey Michael, when you say go back to the “standard colors” I’m guessing you don’t mean all the way back to when all saddlecloths were black. Many of us can remember the days before the colored saddlecloths.
And while I’m on that subject… please, please Tampa Bay Downs – don’t force people who enter your stakes races to wear the post position colors on their jockey’s cap. It’s like it was a $5000 claimer on a Wednesday card. If Ogden Phipps entered in a Tampa stake and drew the 4 hole, his jock would wear black silks and a yellow cap. Claiborne draws the 3 hole and it’s gold silks with a blue cap. Please!

Posted by ljk on February 27, 2008 @ 5:20 pm

What’s wrong with having the races Saturday and Sunday instead of Fri and Sat anyway? Perhaps ESPN isn’t quite that committed to the sport?

Posted by Alan on February 28, 2008 @ 12:24 pm

BC told me that there were people inside the organization that had a “problem” with the word Distaff. As if Ladies Classic is better? Ladies Classic sounds like an LPBA event in Akron, Ohio, and that’s bowling, folks. The old saying is “change is good,” but change for change’s sake is not. Here’s another problem I haven’t seen mentioned: With the Junvenile and Juvenile Fillies off the same card, now we can’t make a sound comparison because the track likely will change from day to day. Almost every move BC has made this year has sapped excitement from the event: More races that lead to less confrontations by horses attempting to race out of their comfort zones, male and female races on the same card used for head-to-head comparison …
And don’t get me started on win-and-you’re-in, with the lunch-pail Salvatore Mile at Monmouth now a critical event. Why not just throw the Patterson in, too? And why do some tracks get win-and-you’re-in events and not eithers. If there are 48 or 49, shouldn’t Maryland have a win-and-you’re in race? See you at the Ladies Classic. — J.S.

Posted by J.S. on February 28, 2008 @ 12:48 pm

I’m surprised to hear that people within the BC had a problem with Distaff — sure, it’s an archaic word, but it fit the context so well and its pejorative sense has been long purged. Ladies’ Classic just sounds ridiculous — the race may as well be called the Powderpuff Classic.
Alan, racing on Saturday and Sunday would make so much more sense. Maybe there’s a conflict with football, though, considering the time of year …

Posted by Jessica on February 28, 2008 @ 1:45 pm

Re: A Sunday card …
Down at Tampa Bay Downs a couple years ago, I remarked to the crossing guard at the parking lot how big the crowd was. “They’re all coming over from church,” he said.

Posted by J.S. on February 28, 2008 @ 2:26 pm

Anyone who’s got a problem with “Distaff” better take a look at the Spinster, the Matron, and the Dowager.

Posted by Teresa on February 28, 2008 @ 3:49 pm

A big day of racing on a Sunday anytime during football season would be a gigantic disaster from all counts. Football is king in this country.
All the female races on one day is a gimmick. I think putting all the two-year-old races one one day (plus the dirt marathon just to keep things at five-and-nine) would have been a better gimmick, but that’s just me, and piggybacking off what J.S. said, this would have made for a nice apples-to-apples comparison among the age groups each day.
Still, I like the idea of livening up the Friday card with Grade 1 races. Before there were zero such races on Friday, and now there are three plus another (the F&M sprint) that is likely to determine a championship.
The argument that “the best race in the history of the BC” was the Distaff and putting that on Friday is ridiculous.
The 2000 Classic and 2003 Turf are right up there as well, and ANY championship race should be capable of those types of finishes, anyway. There have been a fair share of Distaff stinkers.

Posted by Eddie D. on February 28, 2008 @ 4:39 pm