JC / Railbird

I’ll Wait to Join …

So, I’ve been trying to muster interest in the NTRA Horseplayers’ Coalition, which sounded exciting when its formation was announced earlier this year but is decidedly less so now that it has formally launched with the sexy topic of tax reform at the top of its agenda. Horseplayers can join for $25, for which they’ll get legislative updates and discounts from such companies as John Deere and UPS. As Dana points out, the timing is good for what’s essentially a horseplayers’ political action committee, and to be fair, the coalition builds on two things the NTRA does well — Capitol Hill lobbying and managing its purchasing program. I’m certainly not opposed to reforming the unfair taxes heaped on handicappers, having had the good fortune in 2007 to run into the IRS’ outdated and onerous reporting and withholding rules — what was abstractly unpleasant became practically so — and yet, I haven’t rushed to sign up. I can’t shake the sense that this group is more about serving the industry than about serving horseplayers, who care about taxes, but also care about doping, transparency and integrity, takeout, and ongoing ADW disruptions. I’d like to join a coalition that truly represents players on all those matters, not just the one issue that’s in sync with establishment concerns.


3 Comments

I think they see the tax reform issue, in which they will seek tax equity with other similar industries, as a goal that is attainable.
It’s something tangible that the NTRA can say it accomplished (assuming it does so).
There are many issues that affect horseplayers, but what the NTRA is unlikely to get involved in are those issues that affect its members. The NTRA’s hands are somewhat tied by the fact that Churchill, Magna, and NYRA are all members and that TVG contributes to the organization as well.
I think this is a good first goal. Steve Crist thinks a change in the taxes will generate more handle. It’s win-win for horseplayers and NTRA members.

Posted by EJXD2 on April 23, 2008 @ 7:16 pm

I too am ambivalent about the Coalition; one thing that bothers me is that its platform has been developed by a blue ribbon panel — of men! Not one woman on the panel? Surely the NTRA, which says it’s listening to readers & bloggers would have noticed that women play the ponies, too.
In fact, didn’t Lauren Stich win the NHC contest a few years back? Aren’t they aware of the Take Back The Race site? Aren’t they reading Railbird, Superfecta, Brooklyn Backstretch, and the many racing blogs written by women? While the coalition might not be about serving the industry, it surely doesn’t seem to be about serving all horseplayers.
Anyway, the panel is listed on page two of the Players’ Panel Position/Policy Recommendations paper at http://www.ntra.com/content/PlayersPanel_Apr08_HC.doc.

Posted by QQ on April 24, 2008 @ 7:36 pm

Great point, Quinella Queen. A couple years ago, I was in a meeting talking about the results of a handicappers’ focus group and one of moderators looked over at me, and with a smidge of embarrassment, said that the group had been all men — sorry, couldn’t find any women, he said, to which I smiled and replied you didn’t look then. We’re everywhere!
And Ed, I agree the tax issue is a win-win for all and probably the easiest fix to accomplish of the many problems that afflict the industry. I don’t think I phrased my argument well — maybe the coalition’s not so much about serving the industry as it is about creating a horseplayers’ group that fits in neatly with the industry’s concerns. Of course the NTRA isn’t going to do anything that goes against its members’ interests, which pretty much precludes it from acting in horseplayers’ interests except when those interests align …

Posted by Jessica on April 24, 2008 @ 9:35 pm