JC / Railbird

Safety Committee Formed

The Jockey Club, with its usual opacity, has created and announced a Thoroughbred Safety Committee in response to the outcry that followed the death of Eight Belles last Saturday. I’m assuming, since the announcement contains no direct mention of the filly, the Kentucky Derby, or any the criticism that’s been leveled at the industry this week.
Press release text below:

Ogden Mills Phipps, the chairman of The Jockey Club, announced today that the officers of The Jockey Club have commissioned a seven-member Thoroughbred Safety Committee.
Phipps said that the committee would be asked to review every facet of equine health, including breeding practices, medication, the rules of racing and track surfaces, and to recommend actions to be taken by the industry to improve the health and safety of Thoroughbreds.
The recommendations emanating from the two Welfare and Safety of the Racehorse Summits will serve as starting points for the committee. Three of the seven members of the newly formed committee were participants in both summits.
The Jockey Club and Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation coordinated and underwrote those summits in October 2006 and March 2008. A strategic plan developed after the first summit and a summary of recommendations proposed at the second are available [here].
In addition to Phipps, the other officers of The Jockey Club are Vice Chairman William S. Farish and Secretary-Treasurer James C. Brady.
The seven members of the committee are Stuart S. Janney III (chairman), John Barr, James G. (Jimmy) Bell, Dr. Larry Bramlage, Donald R. Dizney, Dell Hancock and Dr. Hiram C. Polk Jr. Each is a member of The Jockey Club.
“All seven of these individuals have dedicated a major part of their lives to Thoroughbred breeding and racing and have shown a consistent and unwavering concern for the welfare of Thoroughbreds,” Phipps said. “We will reach out to involve others in the industry and we will do everything in our power to encourage changes that will benefit the breed in any way. We will do this in a timely manner.”

Note: Will encourage, not mandate, not regulate.
Meanwhile, amid all this talk of improving safety and the breed, IEAH co-president Michael Iavorone boasted on Wednesday that a stallion deal for lightly-raced, achy-hooved Big Brown is nearing completion, and that the farms bidding for the Derby winner’s breeding rights included “one of the most widely recognized stud farms in the world” (Blood-Horse). All the outrage over Eight Belles’ unfortunate death, all the urgent discussion about what happened and what should be done differently, all the critics piling on Rick Porter and Larry Jones — I think we’re talking about the wrong horse, the wrong connections. Big Brown represents the racing industry gone awry, not the filly.
Update: The committee will meet for the first time on May 14 and release a timeline and summary of goals afterward.
Related: The committee needs an independent voice, someone not vested in the industry, writes Alex Brown over on the Rail. Good point.


9 Comments

Hmmm, seems like the foxes are guarding the chicken house. Racing needs a commissioner. Excellent observation on Big Brown. It goes on and on.

Posted by Ferdinand on May 8, 2008 @ 9:56 am

I’ve got a very simple solutions to wade through this whole mess, a lot of these are impossible solutions considering how the framework and hierarchy of racing works.
One ultimate authority in regards to drug rules. This ultimate authority will not have anything to say about surfaces, takeout, adw’s or anything else, even safety. This authority will only dole out viscious lifetime suspensions for drug violations and will eliminate all race day medications and any steroid use, racing locale be damned. You dope, you’re out. It’s very simple.
This needs to be at an NFL like level – people laugh at the NO FUN LEAGUE for their seemingly silly enforcement of uniform violations, but they set a standard of a certain behavior expectation. Racing is very much missing this level of enforcement.
I don’t want to see more freakin’ chiefs. There’s not enough indians on this issue. These chiefs getting together to have another roundtable and talk and send up press releases are the same people who are in employ of the people who are running hopped up horses all over the country.
These issues of breeding and surfaces are non-starters.
The surface issue has become VERY foggy depending on who you listen to. I heard Randy Moss calling for ALL tracks to go synthetic, which I thought was very puzzling coming from someone I respect and consider to have a very scientific approach to the sport. People with agendas like Michael Dickinson have come back out of the woodwork to sell their wares in the last couple of days claiming things that aren’t proven. Can’t trust anyone on this issue.
The breeding will fix itself once the drugs stop. Horses who are unsound in the first place won’t be put on the track in a fog of drugs to appear sound.

Posted by o_crunk on May 8, 2008 @ 10:18 am

Blaaaaaaahhhhhhh… what incentive do any of those committee members have to address breeding issues?
And right on about BB being who everyone should be discussing. We should be discussing BB the implication, not BB the horse (who is very cute, btw).

Posted by dana on May 8, 2008 @ 11:09 am

Oh I so agree. My guess is that it’s Ashford Stud but what do I know. Big Brown’s connections, not him, should go to hell with all of their ill gotten gains. Fine way to thank him–ship him off to cover 200 mares and die of a heart attack prematurely. I still don’t believe what went down on Derby Day, which is one I wish to forget. Three races. Like running to the mailbox is your prep for the New York Marathon.

Posted by Joan Chakonas on May 8, 2008 @ 12:44 pm

Seriously, the whole idea of BB heading off to a cushy stud deal on 3 races is risible. I’d like to mandate that you can’t be an ‘approved’ stallion without a record of durability on the track, and 3 races does not cut it. If you’re not approved, your offspring don’t get registered. End of story.
I agree with o_crunk that we need to address the drugs issue first, but to create a poster boy for breeding problems in America this week of all weeks is simply in poor taste.

Posted by Superfecta on May 8, 2008 @ 1:13 pm

I’m forgiving in so many ways—but when the stud talk starts this early…my Lord, they’re trying to turn ME against them.
I HATE PUBLICIZED BREEDING DEALS in the middle of seasons—before the Preakness??? VOMIT VOMIT VOMIT
Is this supposed to excite racing fans? Are we supposed to applaud this? Woooo hooo, my favorite soph will be retired by the fall!! Woooo flippin HOOOOOO, we’ll never have the chance see this amazing horse as a 4 year-old! YAYYYY! Or on grass several more times!!! Yipeeeeee
What a friggin’ torturous tease. KUDOS, BRAVO to Curlin’s owners for bringing him back. This ain’t a Dutrow thing—THIS AIN’T A DUTROW THING—IEAH??? GRRRRRR $NARRRRRRL GRRRR
My stock in them is plummeting.
P.S. It’s weird—I hear Deadwood (HBO) was a fabulous series, but because it lasted only three seasons, I don’t want to rent it—I don’t want to get attached to the characters.

Posted by Ernie Munick on May 8, 2008 @ 1:19 pm

Watch out everyone…the big man…Ogden Mills Denny Phipps is on the case. The man who helped ruin New York racing in the 1980s and 90s is going to fix all of our problems.
That’s a relief!

Posted by Dave on May 8, 2008 @ 1:31 pm

Here’s to the 200 mares to be bred to a 3 race, bad footed stallion whose offspring won’t be able to hold up to survive 2 races by the time they reach their 3yo campaign in 2013. Look what we have to look forward to! Geez. (No offense, Dana, he is cute but cute don’t help them feet and the foals they get passed on to). I know I’m being snarky but sometimes it justs gets to you.

Posted by Katie aka TripCrown73 on May 8, 2008 @ 6:10 pm

Katie – I wasn’t suggesting that he should be in the shed.

Posted by dana on May 8, 2008 @ 6:30 pm