JC / Railbird

Two Positives

Thanks to Ernie for passing along a link to an article on trainer Rick Dutrow’s latest infraction, a positive for twice the legal level of clenbuterol in a horse named Salute the Count, second place finisher in the G3 Aegon Turf Sprint at Churchill on Kentucky Oaks day. According to chief steward John Veitch, who said the clenbuterol overage was the highest he’d seen in four years, Dutrow waived his right to a formal hearing and “more or less accepted responsibility” (NYT). Paul Moran notes that the positive keeps Dutrow’s dubious streak of being suspended or fined every year since 2000 going, while Ray Paulick is incredulous that Kentucky is treating Dutrow as though it’s his first offense, handing out a 15-day suspension and requiring the return of purse money. Listen to Bozich, babe: “You’re killing the game you say you love.” And IEAH, if you’re really serious about the no-drugs policy and advocating for a zero-tolerance environment, you might want to start looking for a squeaky clean (at least, by current standards) conditioner for your stable.
I’ll grant that might be difficult, when even the sport’s good guys are users, with little separating them from guys like Dutrow other than that they manage to follow the inconsistent, sometimes lax rules of 38 different jurisdictions 99.99% of the time. Clenbuterol, a bronchodilator with steroid-like side effects, is also the drug for which trainer Larry Jones recently received a positive, the first medication violation in his 27-year career if the split sample on Stones River, winner of an allowance on June 8 at Delaware Park, upholds the original test results. Jones, and Stones River owner Jim Squires, contends the positive was sabotage, although the trainer did own there was an “outside shot” the result is legitimate, due to Stones River being injected with clenbuterol the day before Delaware’s 72-hour raceday deadline (Inquirer). The investigation is ongoing, but if the positive is confirmed, Jones could face a $500 fine, seven-day suspension, and purse money forfeiture.
How ludicrous both cases look, especially in the wake of all the discussion and pontificating and committee-organizing that followed poor Eight Belles’ breakdown after the Kentucky Derby. The rule-breaker gets a wrist slap, the rule-follower gets caught on a technicality. No wonder congress held hearings and threatens legislation.


5 Comments

Completely disagree — the idea that there’s “little separating” a guy who has one (or even just a few) positive versus a guy who has 30+ pages of violations is ridiculous. We need, as a sport, to be smart enough to differentiate between the scofflaw and the guy who made a mistake — and to pretend they’re the same is exactly the wrong approach.

Posted by Frank on June 25, 2008 @ 10:20 pm

Frank, I think we agree. Dutrow and Jones are very different, but the system they’re working in both creates situations likely to lead to violations and reduces the degree of difference when those violations occur. What happened to Jones was certainly a mistake — he’s a guy who’s spent his career playing by the rules, including the ones for legal medications — while what happened to Dutrow probably wasn’t. We can make that distinction, but the sport can’t so long as it allows permissive medication use and every jurisdiction operates under its own rules. Sorting out rogues from unfortunates would be much easier for all if drugs in racing were eliminated and uniform rules regarding medication use, withdrawal times, and penalties were adopted …

Posted by Jessica on June 25, 2008 @ 10:46 pm

Isn’t this simple? Other sports have programs akin to three strikes and you’re out, why not racing? I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again: The owners need to be penalized when violations are found for two reasons: 1) A 15-day suspension does nothing to a trainer like Rick Dutrow, whose assistants never miss a beat; yet, that same suspension could devastate a smaller outfit. Why should a larger outfit feel less pain? 2) If owners were penalized, they would lose the incentive to go to cheaters to get an upper hand; they would feel the pain themselves.
When high school or college sports teams use an illegal player, they forfeit those games and often the season — an incentive for all involved to make sure the team is using eligible players. Racing calls the trainer responsible for everything. The owner loses the purse but can keep right on going. Again, larger owners with hundreds of horses barely miss a beat.
It’s time for rules reform. – J.S.

Posted by John S. on June 26, 2008 @ 9:10 am

Jess – thanks for being kinder in your reply than I was in my comment. I agree — clearer, uniform rules would lead to better results and a clearer demarcation of bad guys and good.
John – it’s worth keeping in mind that in a case like the Dutrow incident, the only person who really got punished was the owner. While Dutrow gets a little vacation and his assistants carry on, the owner’s out $20,000. While it may be the trainer who was “responsible,” it’s the owner who really lost out.

Posted by Frank on June 26, 2008 @ 10:02 am

Frank,
You cannot lose what was never yours. — J.S.

Posted by John S. on June 26, 2008 @ 10:16 am