JC / Railbird

#delmarI met Marc Subia today and he told me the story of his amazing autograph jacket. "It's my most prized possession." Marc started coming to Del Mar with his dad in the 1970s. It's his home track. And he's been collecting jockey autographs for decades ...Grand Jete keeping an eye on me as I take a picture of Rushing Fall's #BC17 garland. #thoroughbred #horseracing #delmarAnother #treasurefromthearchive — this UPI collage for Secretariat vs. Sham. #inthearchives #thoroughbred #horseracingThanks, Arlington. Let's do this again next year. #Million35That's a helmet. #BC16 #thoroughbred #horseracing #jockeysLady Eli on the muscle. #BC16 @santaanitapark #breederscup #thoroughbred #horseracing

Empty Pool

I’m so glad to know I’m not the only one glum about the anemic prices and short list of the Kentucky Derby Future Wager. Steven Crist is too:
“There are basically two ways to play the Derby Futures. The first is to be a contrarian, play the field, and say this is going to be another one of those years when the Derby winner is not one of the 23 top prospects as of Valentine’s Day. This would have worked with Smarty Jones last year, and War Emblem in 2002, though not with Funny Cide, the longest shot in Pool 1 at 93-1 two years ago.
“The advantage of this approach is that you’re guaranteed three months of action and likely to end up with something like a 12-horse entry carrying your hopes on Derby Day. The disadvantages are that you’re lucky to get 5-2 and you have to root against all 23 Pool 1 horses, a somewhat miserable way to spend the next 84 days…. What you really want are some plausible 150-1 shots, but under the inadequate way that the Derby Futures are currently set up, you’re never going to find those prices.” (Daily Racing Form — sub. req.)

Catching Cheats

Ed Fountaine has some ideas for stopping racetrack cheats: Increase surveillance and security, give trainers lie detector tests when they apply for licenses, hold vets accountable, reward whistleblowers, and call in the Feds. “Racing’s current method of punishing cheaters — fining and suspending them — only works when the punishment is severe enough to outweigh the risks. Usually, it isn’t. But suppose someone who juiced his horses faced federal prosecution for race-fixing. Then he’d be looking not at a six-month suspension, but rather six years in the slammer.” I’m down with the Feds and rewarding whistleblowers, but lie detector tests seem a little out there. (New York Post)

She’s Not Part of the Act

Pussycat Doll …why is that name so familiar? Oh yeah

← Before After →